Processor N97 vs Atom S1220
Primary details
Comparing Atom S1220 and Processor N97 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1545 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | no data | 27.21 |
| Architecture codename | Centerton (2012) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 11 December 2012 (11 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom S1220 and Processor N97 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom S1220 and Processor N97 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1283 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8.1 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom S1220 and Processor N97. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Atom S1220 and Processor N97 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom S1220 and Processor N97 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom S1220 and Processor N97. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 10.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom S1220 and Processor N97.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 9 |
| PCI support | PCI Support | no data |
| UART | UART | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 December 2012 | 3 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 12 Watt |
Atom S1220 has 50% lower power consumption.
Processor N97, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom S1220 and Processor N97. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom S1220 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N97 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom S1220 and Processor N97, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
