Celeron 6205 vs Atom N450
Primary details
Comparing Atom N450 and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3349 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Atom | Intel Tiger Lake |
Power efficiency | 2.05 | no data |
Architecture codename | Pinetrail (2009−2011) | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
Release date | 21 December 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $64 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom N450 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.66 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.67 GHz | 2/2 GHz |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 66 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 123 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N450 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCBGA559 | BGA1499 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N450 and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom N450 and Celeron 6205 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N450 and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N450 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 21 December 2009 | 1 September 2020 |
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Atom N450 has 200% lower power consumption.
Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom N450 and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N450 and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.