Atom N450 vs Celeron 1007U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1007U and Atom N450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2742not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Pinetrail (2009−2010)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)21 December 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$64
Current price$205 (2.4x MSRP)$348 (5.4x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1007U and Atom N450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.66 GHz
Bus supportno data533 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size118 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million123 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1007U and Atom N450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1007U and Atom N450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron 1007U and Atom N450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1007U and Atom N450 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1007U and Atom N450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size32 GB2 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel GMA 3150
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1007U and Atom N450 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1007U and Atom N450.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 1007U 836
+312%
Atom N450 203

Celeron 1007U outperforms Atom N450 by 312% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 1007U 250
+247%
Atom N450 72

Celeron 1007U outperforms Atom N450 by 247% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 1007U 426
+274%
Atom N450 114

Celeron 1007U outperforms Atom N450 by 274% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron 1007U 1610
+226%
Atom N450 494

Celeron 1007U outperforms Atom N450 by 226% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron 1007U 1
+404%
Atom N450 0

Celeron 1007U outperforms Atom N450 by 404% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2013 21 December 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Cost $86 $64
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 5 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron 1007U and Atom N450. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1007U and Atom N450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1007U
Celeron 1007U
Intel Atom N450
Atom N450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 112 votes

Rate Celeron 1007U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 162 votes

Rate Atom N450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1007U or Atom N450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.