Celeron 927UE vs Atom N435
Primary details
Comparing Atom N435 and Celeron 927UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Atom | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Pinetrail (2009−2011) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 2 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Atom N435 and Celeron 927UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N435 and Celeron 927UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FCBGA559 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N435 and Celeron 927UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N435 and Celeron 927UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 June 2011 | 1 January 2013 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 17 Watt |
Atom N435 has 100% more threads, and 240% lower power consumption.
Celeron 927UE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom N435 and Celeron 927UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N435 and Celeron 927UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
