Athlon Gold 7220C vs Atom N2850
Primary details
Comparing Atom N2850 and Athlon Gold 7220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom N2850 and Athlon Gold 7220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N2850 and Athlon Gold 7220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6,6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2850 and Athlon Gold 7220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 | AMD Radeon 610M |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2012 | 23 May 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Atom N2850 has 150% lower power consumption.
Athlon Gold 7220C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom N2850 and Athlon Gold 7220C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2850 and Athlon Gold 7220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
