Xeon W-11955M vs Celeron B710

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B710
2011
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.07
Xeon W-11955M
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.03
+19943%

Xeon W-11955M outperforms Celeron B710 by a whopping 19943% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3409518
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.96
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency0.1938.20
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70$623

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size131 mm2190 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPGA988,PPGA988FCBGA1787
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B710 0.07
Xeon W-11955M 14.03
+19943%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B710 106
Xeon W-11955M 22477
+21105%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Celeron B710 0.1
Xeon W-11955M 8.6
+14233%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Celeron B710 631
Xeon W-11955M 8815
+1297%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.07 14.03
Integrated graphics card 0.77 5.59
Recency 19 June 2011 11 May 2021
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm

Xeon W-11955M has a 19942.9% higher aggregate performance score, 626% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-11955M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B710 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron B710 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-11955M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B710 and Xeon W-11955M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B710
Celeron B710
Intel Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 103 votes

Rate Celeron B710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 24 votes

Rate Xeon W-11955M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B710 or Xeon W-11955M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.