Athlon 64 X2 3600+ vs Atom N270

Primary details

Comparing Atom N270 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Manchester (2005−2006)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)31 May 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$44no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N270 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Million154 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N270 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437939
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N270 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom N270 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N270 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N270 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N270 136
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ 633
+365%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 31 May 2005
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 89 Watt

Atom N270 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 4350% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 3600+, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between Atom N270 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N270 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 3600+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N270 and Athlon 64 X2 3600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N270
Atom N270
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+
Athlon 64 X2 3600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 225 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 78 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N270 or Athlon 64 X2 3600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.