Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U vs Atom N2650
Primary details
Comparing Atom N2650 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 678 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 72.37 |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom N2650 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N2650 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3,6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 | AMD Radeon 740M |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2012 | 23 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 15 Watt |
Atom N2650 has 400% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom N2650 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2650 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
