Celeron SU2300 vs Atom N2600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N2600
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 3 Watt
0.20

Celeron SU2300 outperforms Atom N2600 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2600 and Celeron SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32333112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency4.732.84
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)no data
Release date1 December 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2600 and Celeron SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2600 and Celeron SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA559BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)3.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2600 and Celeron SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N2600 and Celeron SU2300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2600 and Celeron SU2300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2600 and Celeron SU2300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size2.44 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom N2600 0.20
Celeron SU2300 0.30
+50%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N2600 316
Celeron SU2300 482
+52.5%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom N2600 75
Celeron SU2300 160
+113%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom N2600 210
Celeron SU2300 278
+32.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 0.30
Recency 1 December 2011 1 July 2009
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 10 Watt

Atom N2600 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron SU2300, on the other hand, has a 50% higher aggregate performance score.

The Celeron SU2300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N2600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2600 and Celeron SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2600
Atom N2600
Intel Celeron SU2300
Celeron SU2300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 183 votes

Rate Atom N2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 3 votes

Rate Celeron SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2600 or Celeron SU2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.