i9-14900 vs Atom E680

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom E680 and Core i9-14900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.86
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data43.98
Architecture codenameTunnel Creek (2010)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date14 September 2010 (14 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom E680 and Core i9-14900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rateno data219 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size26 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors47 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom E680 and Core i9-14900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 676FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E680 and Core i9-14900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom E680 and Core i9-14900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E680 and Core i9-14900 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E680 and Core i9-14900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 600Intel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom E680 and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom E680 and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom E680 and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E680 and Core i9-14900.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom E680 346
i9-14900 47973
+13765%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 September 2010 8 January 2024
Physical cores 1 24
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 65 Watt

Atom E680 has 1525% lower power consumption.

i9-14900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and 2300% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Atom E680 and Core i9-14900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom E680 is a notebook processor while Core i9-14900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E680 and Core i9-14900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom E680
Atom E680
Intel Core i9-14900
Core i9-14900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 71 vote

Rate Core i9-14900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom E680 or Core i9-14900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.