Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ vs Atom D510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D510
2009, $97
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.23
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
2023, $6,497
48 cores / 96 threads, 350 Watt
45.20
+19552%

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ outperforms Atom D510 by a whopping 19552% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking344466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.94
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency1.9013.84
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date21 December 2009 (15 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$6,497

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Atom D510 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads496
Base clock speed1.66 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB300 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size66 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom D510 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA5594677
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D510 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data

Security technologies

Atom D510 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D510 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D510 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D510 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom D510 0.23
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ 45.20
+19552%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom D510 406
Samples: 63
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ 79683
+19526%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 45.20
Recency 21 December 2009 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 4 96
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 350 Watt

Atom D510 has 2592.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+, on the other hand, has a 19552.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D510 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom D510 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D510
Atom D510
Intel Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 59 votes

Rate Atom D510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8568Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom D510 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.