Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ vs Atom D425
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ outperforms Atom D425 by a whopping 45070% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3651 | 66 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.94 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.07 | 13.85 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Pineview (2009−2011) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| Release date | 21 June 2010 (15 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $993 | $6,497 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Atom D425 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ have a nearly equal value for money.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Atom D425 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 300 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 123 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom D425 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D425 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Atom D425 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D425 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D425 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 3150 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D425 and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.10 | 45.17 |
| Recency | 21 June 2010 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 48 |
| Threads | 2 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 350 Watt |
Atom D425 has 3400% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+, on the other hand, has a 45070% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 4700% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D425 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom D425 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
