Core i7 vs Atom C3955
Aggregate performance score
Atom C3955 outperforms Core i7 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom C3955 and Core i7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1378 | 1659 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.83 | 5.71 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Architecture codename | Goldmont (2016−2017) | no data |
| Release date | 15 August 2017 (6 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $434 | no data |
| Current price | $850 (2x MSRP) | $263 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Core i7 has 588% better value for money than Atom C3955.
Detailed specifications
Atom C3955 and Core i7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 16 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 896 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 78 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom C3955 and Core i7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA1310 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3955 and Core i7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| QuickAssist | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Status | Launched | no data |
Security technologies
Atom C3955 and Core i7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Boot | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| SGX | - | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3955 and Core i7 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3955 and Core i7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4: 2400 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3955 and Core i7.
| PCIe version | 3 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
| USB revision | 3 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 16 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 16 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | 4x10/2.5/1 GBE | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Atom C3955 outperforms Core i7 by 52% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i7 outperforms Atom C3955 by 32% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.75 | 2.46 |
| Recency | 15 August 2017 | 1 October 2023 |
The Atom C3955 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom C3955 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3955 and Core i7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
