Celeron J3455 vs Atom C3955

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3955
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 32 Watt
3.65
+157%
Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.42

Atom C3955 outperforms Celeron J3455 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3955 and Celeron J3455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14892193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.980.22
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
Power efficiency10.7913.44
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$434$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Atom C3955 has 345% better value for money than Celeron J3455.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3955 and Celeron J3455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Multiplier2115
L1 cache896 KBno data
L2 cache16 MB2 MB
L3 cache16 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3955 and Celeron J3455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3955 and Celeron J3455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Atom C3955 and Celeron J3455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
SGX-no data
OS Guard+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3955 and Celeron J3455 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3955 and Celeron J3455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size256 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom C3955 and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom C3955 and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3955 and Celeron J3455.

PCIe version32.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revision32.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports162
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports162
Number of USB ports88
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBE-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3955 3.65
+157%
Celeron J3455 1.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3955 5803
+157%
Celeron J3455 2256

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.65 1.42
Recency 15 August 2017 30 August 2016
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 10 Watt

Atom C3955 has a 157% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron J3455, on the other hand, has 220% lower power consumption.

The Atom C3955 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3455 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3955 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J3455 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3955 and Celeron J3455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3955
Atom C3955
Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3955 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 226 votes

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3955 or Celeron J3455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.