Atom C3338 vs Celeron J3455

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.46
+121%

Celeron J3455 outperforms Atom C3338 by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3455 and Atom C3338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20882640
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.07
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date30 August 2016 (7 years ago)22 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$27
Current price$189 (1.8x MSRP)$698 (25.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455 and Atom C3338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C89 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455 and Atom C3338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455 and Atom C3338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3455 and Atom C3338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Boot++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guard-+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455 and Atom C3338 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455 and Atom C3338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/sDDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455 and Atom C3338 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455 and Atom C3338 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455 and Atom C3338.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanes610
USB revision2.0/3.03
Total number of SATA ports210
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports210
Number of USB ports88
Integrated LAN-4x2.5/1 GBE
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3455 1.46
+121%
Atom C3338 0.66

Celeron J3455 outperforms Atom C3338 by 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron J3455 2258
+120%
Atom C3338 1028

Celeron J3455 outperforms Atom C3338 by 120% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 0.66
Recency 30 August 2016 22 February 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Cost $107 $27
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 8 Watt

The Celeron J3455 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3338 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J3455 is a notebook processor while Atom C3338 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455 and Atom C3338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455
Intel Atom C3338
Atom C3338

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 189 votes

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3455 or Atom C3338, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.