FX-4100 vs Atom C3858

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3858
2017
12 cores / 12 threads, 25 Watt
3.04
+79.9%

Atom C3858 outperforms FX-4100 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3858 and FX-4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15541970
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.390.24
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date15 August 2017 (6 years ago)12 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$332no data
Current price$1249 (3.8x MSRP)$28

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Atom C3858 has 63% better value for money than FX-4100.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3858 and FX-4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache672 KB192 KB
L2 cache12 MB4096 KB
L3 cache12 MB8192 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °C71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3858 and FX-4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1310AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3858 and FX-4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Atom C3858 and FX-4100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3858 and FX-4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3858 and FX-4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3858 and FX-4100.

PCIe version3n/a
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3858 3.04
+79.9%
FX-4100 1.69

Atom C3858 outperforms FX-4100 by 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom C3858 4707
+80.4%
FX-4100 2609

Atom C3858 outperforms FX-4100 by 80% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.04 1.69
Recency 15 August 2017 12 October 2011
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 95 Watt

The Atom C3858 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3858 is a server/workstation processor while FX-4100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3858 and FX-4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3858
Atom C3858
AMD FX-4100
FX-4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3858 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 833 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3858 or FX-4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.