Microsoft SQ1 vs Atom C3708

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomQualcomm Snapdragon
Power efficiencyno data0.12
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)2 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed1.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache448 KBno data
L2 cache16 MBno data
L3 cache16 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1310no data
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt3000 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133no data
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataQualcomm Adreno 685

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1.

PCIe version3no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 2 October 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 3000 Watt

Atom C3708 has 17547.1% lower power consumption.

Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom C3708 is a server/workstation processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3708
Atom C3708
Microsoft SQ1
SQ1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom C3708 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 58 votes

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3708 or Microsoft SQ1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.