Microsoft SQ1 vs Atom C3708
Primary details
Comparing Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 1482 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | Intel Atom | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
Power efficiency | no data | 0.12 |
Architecture codename | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
Release date | 15 August 2017 (7 years ago) | 2 October 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 3 GHz |
Multiplier | 17 | no data |
L1 cache | 448 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 16 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 85 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | FCBGA1310 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
QuickAssist | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Boot | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
SGX | - | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4: 2133 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 256 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1.
PCIe version | 3 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
USB revision | 3 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 16 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 16 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | 4x10/2.5/1 GBE | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 15 August 2017 | 2 October 2019 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 3000 Watt |
Atom C3708 has 17547.1% lower power consumption.
Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom C3708 is a server/workstation processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3708 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.