Xeon D-1527 vs Atom C3538

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Atom C3538
2017
4 cores / 4 threads
1.22

Xeon D-1527 outperforms Atom C3538 by a whopping 176% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1527 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22161471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.050.08
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Xeon D
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date15 August 2017 (6 years ago)1 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$213
Current price$3784 (50.5x MSRP)$3299 (15.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon D-1527 has 60% better value for money than Atom C3538.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1527 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache224 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB1.5 MB (per core)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1527 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1310FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1527. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
GPIOno data+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1527 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1527 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1527. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/s34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1527.

PCIe version32.0/3.0
PCI Express lanes1232
USB revision32.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports126
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports12no data
Number of USB ports88
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBE+
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3538 1.22
Xeon D-1527 3.37
+176%

Xeon D-1527 outperforms Atom C3538 by 176% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom C3538 1889
Xeon D-1527 5213
+176%

Xeon D-1527 outperforms Atom C3538 by 176% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 3.37
Recency 15 August 2017 1 November 2015
Threads 4 8
Cost $75 $213
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon D-1527 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3538 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3538 and Xeon D-1527, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3538
Atom C3538
Intel Xeon D-1527
Xeon D-1527

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Atom C3538 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate Xeon D-1527 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3538 or Xeon D-1527, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.