Celeron N3160 vs Atom C3538

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3538
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.22
+60.5%

Atom C3538 outperforms Celeron N3160 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3538 and Celeron N3160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22182530
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date15 August 2017 (6 years ago)1 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$107
Current price$3784 (50.5x MSRP)$288 (2.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3538 and Celeron N3160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.24 GHz
L1 cache224 KBno data
L2 cache8 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature87 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3538 and Celeron N3160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1310FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3538 and Celeron N3160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
StatusLaunchedLaunched
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Atom C3538 and Celeron N3160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Boot++
Secure Key++
Identity Protectionno data+
SGX-no data
OS Guard+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3538 and Celeron N3160 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3538 and Celeron N3160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Braswell)
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data640 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom C3538 and Celeron N3160 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom C3538 and Celeron N3160 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3538 and Celeron N3160.

PCIe version32.0
PCI Express lanes124
USB revision32.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports122
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports122
Number of USB ports85
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBE-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3538 1.22
+60.5%
Celeron N3160 0.76

Atom C3538 outperforms Celeron N3160 by 61% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom C3538 1889
+60.4%
Celeron N3160 1178

Atom C3538 outperforms Celeron N3160 by 60% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom C3538 255
+51.8%
Celeron N3160 168

Atom C3538 outperforms Celeron N3160 by 52% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom C3538 895
+78.6%
Celeron N3160 501

Atom C3538 outperforms Celeron N3160 by 79% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 0.76
Recency 15 August 2017 1 April 2016
Cost $75 $107
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

The Atom C3538 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3160 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3538 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N3160 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3538 and Celeron N3160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3538
Atom C3538
Intel Celeron N3160
Celeron N3160

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Atom C3538 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 194 votes

Rate Celeron N3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3538 or Celeron N3160, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.