Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom 330
2008, $43
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.22
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
42.84
+19373%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Atom 330 by a whopping 19373% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking349176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency1.166.46
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Chagall PRO (2022)
Release date2 April 2008 (17 years ago)8 March 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier1236
L1 cache112 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size51.9276 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors94 Million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437WRX8
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Atom 330 0.22
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 42.84
+19373%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Atom 330 381
Samples: 194
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 75048
+19598%
Samples: 220

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 42.84
Recency 2 April 2008 8 March 2022
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 280 Watt

Atom 330 has 3400% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, on the other hand, has a 19372.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom 330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 68 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 40 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom 330 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.