Atom E3825 vs 330
Aggregate performance score
Atom E3825 outperforms Atom 330 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom 330 and Atom E3825 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3195 | 3185 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | Atom |
| Power efficiency | 2.74 | 3.81 |
| Architecture codename | Diamondville (2008−2009) | Bay Trail-I (2013) |
| Release date | 2 April 2008 (16 years ago) | 8 October 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $43 | $73 |
Detailed specifications
Atom 330 and Atom E3825 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 0.1 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 533.33 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 12 | no data |
| L1 cache | 112 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 51.9276 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 85 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 94 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.9V-1.1625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom 330 and Atom E3825 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | PBGA437 | Intel BGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Atom E3825. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom 330 and Atom E3825 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Atom E3825 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Atom E3825. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel HD Graphics |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Recency | 2 April 2008 | 8 October 2013 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 6 Watt |
Atom 330 has 100% more threads.
Atom E3825, on the other hand, has a 4.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom 330 and Atom E3825.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Atom E3825, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
