Ultra 7 265T vs Atom 330

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3189not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency2.72no data
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA4371851
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265T are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265T.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 35 Watt

Atom 330 has 337.5% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265T, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
Core Ultra 7 265T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 65 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Core Ultra 7 265T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.