Ultra 7 265K vs Atom 330

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated86
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data89.71
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data28.19
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA4371851
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
Ultra 7 265K 59145
+16193%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 125 Watt

Atom 330 has 1462.5% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 900% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 64 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 65 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.