Ultra 7 265K vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom 330
2008
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.23
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.17
+16061%

Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms Atom 330 by a whopping 16061% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking319086
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data94.42
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency2.7228.14
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data12
Threads420
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-6400
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency-2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP-4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom 330 0.23
Ultra 7 265K 37.17
+16061%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
Ultra 7 265K 59041
+16165%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 37.17
Recency 2 April 2008 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 125 Watt

Atom 330 has 1462.5% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has a 16060.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 900% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265K is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom 330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 65 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 88 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.