Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3175not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency2.72no data
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Kentsfield (2007)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)23 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43$266

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB8 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size51.9276 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data62 °C
Number of transistors94 Million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437775
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W).

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 23 July 2007
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 95 Watt

Atom 330 has an age advantage of 8 months, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1087.5% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between Atom 330 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 64 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 426 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.