Atom C3758 vs 330

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Atom C3758 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.58
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Power efficiencyno data10.98
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Atom C3758 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier1222
L1 cache112 KB448 KB
L2 cache1 MB16 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C82 °C
Number of transistors94 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Atom C3758 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Atom C3758. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Atom C3758 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Atom C3758 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Atom C3758. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4: 2400
Maximum memory size8 GB256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Atom C3758.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
Atom C3758 4614
+1171%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 25 Watt

Atom 330 has 212.5% lower power consumption.

Atom C3758, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom 330 and Atom C3758. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Atom C3758 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Atom C3758, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 64 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Atom C3758, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.