Athlon 1333 vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3494not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency1.16no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Thunderbird C (2000−2001)
Release date2 April 2008 (18 years ago)21 March 2001 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Atom 330 and Athlon 1333: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm180 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2120 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Million37 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Athlon 1333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437A
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt70 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Athlon 1333. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Athlon 1333 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Athlon 1333 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Athlon 1333. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 21 March 2001
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 70 Watt

Atom 330 has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Atom 330 and AMD Athlon 1333. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Athlon 1333 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 70 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon 1333 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom 330 and Athlon 1333, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.