Ryzen 3 3250U vs Athlon X4 970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 970
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.71
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.49
+45.6%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Athlon X4 970 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 970 and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19581672
Place by popularitynot in top-10067
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$59 $430

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 970 and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm12 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 970 and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 970 and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 970 and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 970 and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 970 and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 970 1.71
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.49
+45.6%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Athlon X4 970 by 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X4 970 2644
Ryzen 3 3250U 3845
+45.4%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms Athlon X4 970 by 45% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.71 2.49
Recency 27 July 2017 6 January 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 3 3250U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 970 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X4 970 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 3250U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 970 and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 970
Athlon X4 970
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 111 votes

Rate Athlon X4 970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1983 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 970 or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.