Ryzen 3 3250U vs A6-9500E

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9500E
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.15
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.49
+117%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms A6-9500E by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9500E and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23931765
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency3.0015.14
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9500E and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-9500E and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9500E and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9500E and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9500E and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 3
iGPU core count4no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9500E and Ryzen 3 3250U integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9500E and Ryzen 3 3250U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9500E and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes812

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9500E 1.15
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.49
+117%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9500E 1756
Ryzen 3 3250U 3809
+117%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 2.49
Recency 27 July 2017 6 January 2020
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 3250U has a 116.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3250U is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9500E in performance tests.

Note that A6-9500E is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 3250U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9500E and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9500E
A6-9500E
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 48 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2111 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9500E or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.