Apple M1 vs Athlon X4 950

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 950
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.35

Apple M1 outperforms Athlon X4 950 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 950 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18091190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.66no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency3.30no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)no data
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 950 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 950 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 950 and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 950 and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 950 and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 950 2.35
Apple M1 5.36
+128%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 950 3596
Apple M1 8207
+128%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.35 5.36
Recency 27 July 2017 10 November 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has a 128.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 950 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X4 950 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 950 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 950
Athlon X4 950
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 283 votes

Rate Athlon X4 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2223 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 950 or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.