Apple M1 vs A6-9500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9500
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.22

Apple M1 outperforms A6-9500 by a whopping 335% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9500 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22451113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)no data
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64no data
Current price$36 (0.6x MSRP)$3.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-9500 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data2 MB
L2 cache1024 KB16 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9500 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9500 and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9500 and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9500 and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsApple M1 8-Core GPU
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9500 and Apple M1 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9500 and Apple M1 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9500 and Apple M1.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9500 1.22
Apple M1 5.31
+335%

Apple M1 outperforms A6-9500 by 335% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9500 1881
Apple M1 8207
+336%

Apple M1 outperforms A6-9500 by 336% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 5.31
Recency 27 July 2017 10 November 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

The Apple M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9500 in performance tests.

Note that A6-9500 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9500 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9500
A6-9500
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 176 votes

Rate A6-9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2109 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9500 or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.