A10-9620P vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.40
+175%
A10-9620P
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms A10-9620P by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-9620P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13472106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency6.4010.09
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die size209.78 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSocket AM4FP4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-9620P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-9620P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Vega 8AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-9620P.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 4.40
+175%
A10-9620P 1.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 6989
+175%
A10-9620P 2538

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.40 1.60
Integrated graphics card 4.51 2.44
Recency 30 September 2019 1 January 2017
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a 175% higher aggregate performance score, 84.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

A10-9620P, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9620P in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a desktop processor while A10-9620P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A10-9620P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 147 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 313 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G or A10-9620P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.