Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 vs Athlon X2 QL-65

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 QL-65
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.38
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46
+21.1%

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-65 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-65 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30252938
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon2x AMD Turion Ultra
Power efficiency1.031.24
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Puma (2008−2009)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-65 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-65 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 QL-65 0.38
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 0.46
+21.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon X2 QL-65 1630
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 1777
+9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon X2 QL-65 3213
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 3441
+7.1%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon X2 QL-65 1489
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 1546
+3.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 0.46
Recency 1 September 2009 3 June 2008

Athlon X2 QL-65 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82, on the other hand, has a 21.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 QL-65 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-65 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 127 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 24 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-65 or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.