Core i3-N300 vs Athlon X2 QL-64

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1057
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlonno data
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Alder Lake-N
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years old)3 January 2023 (1 year old)
Current price$102 no data

Technical specs

Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus support3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
PowerNow+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoringno data+
GPIOno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X2 QL-64 622
i3-N300 8475
+1263%

Core i3-N300 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-64 by 1263% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Athlon X2 QL-64 1614
i3-N300 2884
+78.7%

Core i3-N300 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-64 by 79% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Athlon X2 QL-64 3223
i3-N300 12014
+273%

Core i3-N300 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-64 by 273% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Athlon X2 QL-64 1468
i3-N300 4261
+190%

Core i3-N300 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-64 by 190% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Athlon X2 QL-64 42.8
i3-N300 17.49
+145%

Athlon X2 QL-64 outperforms Core i3-N300 by 145% in wPrime 32.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 January 2009 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-64 and Core i3-N300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
Athlon X2 QL-64
Intel Core i3-N300
Core i3-N300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 28 votes

Rate Intel Core i3-N300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-64 or Core i3-N300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.