AMD Athlon X2 QL-60 vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Comparing Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Manufacturing process technology
64 bit support
Information on Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
Power consumption (TDP)
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U.
Supported memory types
Maximum memory size
Max memory channels
Maximum memory bandwidth
35.76 GB / s
ECC memory support
General parameters of GPUs integrated into Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U.
Max number of PCIe lanes
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Athlon X2 QL-60 4.51
Ryzen 3 3200U 5.19 +15.1%
Athlon X2 QL-60 1352
Ryzen 3 3200U 3755 +177.7%
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Athlon X2 QL-60 1273
Ryzen 3 3200U 4258 +234.5%
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Athlon X2 QL-60 2803
Ryzen 3 3200U 9284 +231.2%
Let's see how good Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD Athlon X2 QL-60
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)
3DNow! (older SIMD instructions set used by AMD CPUs. Supercedes MMX, works with 64-bit registers)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
15.1% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (6 January 2018 vs 3 June 2008)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 65 nm)
Less power hungry (15 vs 35 watts)
AVX2 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2 - an extension to AVX, the set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions - a set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard instructions set - hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption. Speeds up encryption software, e.g. Veracrypt)
x86-64 (a general name for 64-bit extension of x86 instruction set. There are AMD64 and Intel 64 versions that differ very little)
So, Athlon X2 QL-60 or Ryzen 3 3200U?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD Ryzen 3 3200U.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-60 and Ryzen 3 3200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.