Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Celeron M 520

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing Celeron M 520 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MMobile Athlon 64
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release dateno dataAugust 2005 (18 years old)
Current price$140 no data

Technical specs

Celeron M 520 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus support533 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128K
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nmno data
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 520 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478754
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt81 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 520 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron M 520 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 520 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 520 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron M 520 239
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ 356
+49%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ outperforms Celeron M 520 by 49% in Passmark.

Advantages and disadvantages


Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 81 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 520 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 520 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 520
Celeron M 520
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 43 votes

Rate Celeron M 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 520 or Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.