EPYC 9654 vs Athlon X2 450

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Athlon X2 450
2014
2 cores / 2 threads
0.85
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
79.71
+9278%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Athlon X2 450 by 9278% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Athlon X2 450 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data11.92
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Genoa
Release date31 July 2014 (9 years old)10 November 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current priceno data$3975 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Athlon X2 450 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128K64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size245 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 450 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFM2+SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 450 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 450 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 450 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 450 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 450 0.85
EPYC 9654 79.71
+9278%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Athlon X2 450 by 9278% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon X2 450 1295
EPYC 9654 122091
+9328%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Athlon X2 450 by 9328% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.85 79.71
Recency 31 July 2014 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon X2 450 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 450 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 450
Athlon X2 450
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate AMD Athlon X2 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 450 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.