Celeron N2840 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon NeoIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameCongo (2009)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB1 BGAFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHT 3.0, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+

Security technologies

Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.32 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2840.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 529
Celeron N2840 587
+11%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 1331
Celeron N2840 1331

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 2565
+1.2%
Celeron N2840 2533

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 1155
Celeron N2840 1510
+30.7%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2009 22 May 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron N2840 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 157.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2840. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335
Athlon Neo X2 L335
Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 630 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo X2 L335 or Celeron N2840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.