C-60 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Neo X2 L335
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.33
+65%

Athlon Neo X2 L335 outperforms C-60 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo X2 L335 and C-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30873234
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon NeoAMD C-Series
Power efficiency1.742.10
Architecture codenameCongo (2009)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)22 August 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo X2 L335 and C-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo X2 L335 and C-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB1 BGAFT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and C-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHT 3.0, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and C-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and C-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6290

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 0.33
+65%
C-60 0.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 529
+67.4%
C-60 316

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 1331
+73.4%
C-60 768

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 2565
+72.9%
C-60 1483

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 1155
+53.4%
C-60 753

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 98.5
C-60 86.15
+14.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 0.20
Recency 1 October 2009 22 August 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 9 Watt

Athlon Neo X2 L335 has a 65% higher aggregate performance score.

C-60, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is our recommended choice as it beats the C-60 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo X2 L335 and C-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335
Athlon Neo X2 L335
AMD C-60
C-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 244 votes

Rate C-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo X2 L335 or C-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.