Duron 900 vs Athlon Neo MV-40
Primary details
Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Duron 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3275 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Athlon Neo | AMD Duron |
| Power efficiency | 1.07 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Huron (2009) | Spitfire (2000−2001) |
| Release date | 6 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 2 April 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $129 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon Neo MV-40 and Duron 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | 1600 MHz | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 9 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 64 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 100 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Duron 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | ASB1 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Duron 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Duron 900 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Duron 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 Depends on motherboard |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2009 | 2 April 2001 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Athlon Neo MV-40 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 176.9% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Duron 900. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon Neo MV-40 is a notebook processor while Duron 900 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Duron 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
