A6-3650 vs Athlon II X4 640
Aggregated performance score
Athlon II X4 640 outperforms A6-3650 by 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Athlon II X4 640 and A6-3650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2061 | 2130 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 2.92 | 5.42 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Propus (2009−2011) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 11 May 2010 (13 years ago) | 30 June 2011 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | no data |
| Current price | $67 (0.8x MSRP) | $33 |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
A6-3650 has 86% better value for money than Athlon II X4 640.
Technical specs
Athlon II X4 640 and A6-3650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 169 mm2 | 228 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 300 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X4 640 and A6-3650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | FM1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 100 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 640 and A6-3650 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 640 and A6-3650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon HD 6530D |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 640 and A6-3650.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Athlon II X4 640 outperforms A6-3650 by 9% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Athlon II X4 640 outperforms A6-3650 by 9% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Athlon II X4 640 outperforms A6-3650 by 3% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Athlon II X4 640 outperforms A6-3650 by 2% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 1.45 | 1.33 |
| Recency | 11 May 2010 | 30 June 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 100 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 640 and A6-3650. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 640 and A6-3650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
