Duron 800 vs Celeron 445

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 445 and Duron 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Duron
Architecture codenameConroe-CL (2008)Spitfire (2000−2001)
Release dateMay 2008 (16 years ago)17 October 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$170

Detailed specifications

Celeron 445 and Duron 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz0.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data200 MT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB64 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die size76 mm2105.68 mm2
Number of transistors105 million25 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 445 and Duron 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket771A
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 445 and Duron 800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 445 and Duron 800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 445 and Duron 800 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 445 and Duron 800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR1 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 445 has a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

Duron 800, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 445 and Duron 800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 445 and Duron 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 445
Celeron 445
AMD Duron 800
Duron 800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron 445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate Duron 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 445 or Duron 800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.