AMD Athlon 3000G vs Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008
4 cores / 4 threads
3.01
+2.7%
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads
2.93

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Athlon 3000G by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15261540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.7210.38
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Zen+ (2018−2020)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years old)7 November 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$49
Current price$790 $131 (2.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 3000G has 1342% better value for money than Core 2 Extreme QX9770.

Technical specs

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache12 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2209.78 mm2?
Maximum core temperature56 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)55 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775AM4
Power consumption (TDP)136 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
PowerNowno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB?
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 3.01
+2.7%
Athlon 3000G 2.93

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Athlon 3000G by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 4611
+2.7%
Athlon 3000G 4488

Core 2 Extreme QX9770 outperforms Athlon 3000G by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.01 2.93
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 136 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon 3000G. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9770 and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 228 votes

Rate Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1942 votes

Rate AMD Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9770 or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.