Celeron 2.8 GHz vs Athlon II X4 631
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X4 631 and Celeron 2.8 GHz processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2213 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
Release date | 17 August 2011 (13 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X4 631 and Celeron 2.8 GHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X4 631 and Celeron 2.8 GHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FM1 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 52.8 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 631 and Celeron 2.8 GHz are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 631 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 52 Watt |
Athlon II X4 631 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 2.8 GHz, on the other hand, has 92.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X4 631 and Celeron 2.8 GHz. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X4 631 is a desktop processor while Celeron 2.8 GHz is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 631 and Celeron 2.8 GHz, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.