E2-9000 vs Athlon II X2 255

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 255
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.76
+18.8%

Athlon II X2 255 outperforms E2-9000 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 255 and E2-9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25582669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataBristol Ridge
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date25 January 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data
Current price$16.55 (0.3x MSRP)$78

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 255 and E2-9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size117 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors410 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 255 and E2-9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 255 and E2-9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSingle-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization,

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 255 and E2-9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 255 and E2-9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 255 and E2-9000.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 255 0.76
+18.8%
E2-9000 0.64

Athlon II X2 255 outperforms E2-9000 by 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon II X2 255 1170
+19%
E2-9000 983

Athlon II X2 255 outperforms E2-9000 by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 0.64
Recency 25 January 2010 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

The Athlon II X2 255 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9000 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X2 255 is a desktop processor while E2-9000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 255 and E2-9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 255
Athlon II X2 255
AMD E2-9000
E2-9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 155 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 304 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 255 or E2-9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.