Atom S1220 vs Athlon II X2 235e
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X2 235e and Atom S1220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2770 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.49 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.42 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Regor (2009−2013) | Centerton (2012) |
| Release date | 20 October 2009 (15 years ago) | 11 December 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $84 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X2 235e and Atom S1220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 117 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X2 235e and Atom S1220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | FCBGA1283 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 8.1 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 235e and Atom S1220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 235e and Atom S1220 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 235e and Atom S1220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 10.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 235e and Atom S1220.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
| PCI support | no data | PCI Support |
| UART | no data | UART |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 October 2009 | 11 December 2012 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 8 Watt |
Atom S1220 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 462.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X2 235e and Atom S1220. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X2 235e is a desktop processor while Atom S1220 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 235e and Atom S1220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
