Mobile A A110 vs Athlon II X3 400e
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X3 400e and Mobile A A110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2623 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.07 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Mobile A |
| Power efficiency | 1.74 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Rana (2009−2011) | Stealey (2007) |
| Release date | 20 October 2009 (15 years ago) | 4 June 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X3 400e and Mobile A A110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 169 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 300 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X3 400e and Mobile A A110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3 | 663-ball micro-FCBGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 3 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X3 400e and Mobile A A110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X3 400e and Mobile A A110.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 October 2009 | 4 June 2007 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 1 |
| Threads | 3 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 3 Watt |
Athlon II X3 400e has an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile A A110, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X3 400e and Mobile A A110. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X3 400e is a desktop processor while Mobile A A110 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X3 400e and Mobile A A110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
