Sempron 2200+ vs Athlon II X2 220

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 220 and Sempron 2200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2741not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.30no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.96no data
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Barton (2001−2004)
Release date21 September 2010 (14 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$32$30

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 220 and Sempron 2200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size117 mm2101 mm2
Number of transistors410 million63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 220 and Sempron 2200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3A
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt62 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 220 and Sempron 2200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 220 and Sempron 2200+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 220 1043
+467%
Sempron 2200+ 184

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 62 Watt

Athlon II X2 220 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.

Sempron 2200+, on the other hand, has 4.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X2 220 and Sempron 2200+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 220 and Sempron 2200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 220
Athlon II X2 220
AMD Sempron 2200+
Sempron 2200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 231 vote

Rate Athlon II X2 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 11 votes

Rate Sempron 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 220 or Sempron 2200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.