Xeon Bronze 3408U vs Athlon 900
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 900 and Xeon Bronze 3408U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Thunderbird (2000) | Sapphire Rapids |
| Release date | June 2000 (23 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Current price | $4.95 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 900 and Xeon Bronze 3408U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 22.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 120 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 79 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 79 °C |
| Number of transistors | 37 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 900 and Xeon Bronze 3408U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | A | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 900 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Athlon 900 and Xeon Bronze 3408U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 900 and Xeon Bronze 3408U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 900 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR5-4000 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 900 and Xeon Bronze 3408U.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 125 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Athlon 900 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon 900 is a desktop processor while Xeon Bronze 3408U is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 900 and Xeon Bronze 3408U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
