Xeon Bronze 3408U vs E7450

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7450
2008
90 Watt
6.25
+3.8%
Xeon Bronze 3408U
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
6.02

Xeon E7450 outperforms Xeon Bronze 3408U by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7450 and Xeon Bronze 3408U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10681092
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data27.68
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.574.56
Architecture codenameno dataSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7450 and Xeon Bronze 3408U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Threadsno data8
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speedno data1.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L3 Cache22.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.9V-1.45Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7450 and Xeon Bronze 3408U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA604FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7450 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E7450 and Xeon Bronze 3408U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7450 and Xeon Bronze 3408U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7450 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4000
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7450 and Xeon Bronze 3408U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7450 6.25
+3.8%
Xeon Bronze 3408U 6.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E7450 9932
+3.9%
Xeon Bronze 3408U 9557

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.25 6.02
Recency 1 July 2008 10 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E7450 has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3408U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E7450 and Xeon Bronze 3408U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7450 and Xeon Bronze 3408U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7450
Xeon E7450
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U
Xeon Bronze 3408U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate Xeon E7450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3408U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7450 or Xeon Bronze 3408U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.