i5-11400F vs Athlon 950
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 950 and Core i5-11400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 722 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 38 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 37.63 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | no data | 15.59 |
Architecture codename | Thunderbird (1999−2000) | Rocket Lake (2021) |
Release date | 6 March 2000 (24 years ago) | 16 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $157 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon 950 and Core i5-11400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 0.95 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 180 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 102 mm2 | 276 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | 22 million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 950 and Core i5-11400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | A | FCLGA1200 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 950 and Core i5-11400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 950 and Core i5-11400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
SGX | no data | - |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 950 and Core i5-11400F are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 950 and Core i5-11400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 50 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 950 and Core i5-11400F.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 6 March 2000 | 16 March 2021 |
Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
Threads | 1 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 180 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 65 Watt |
Athlon 950 has 4.8% lower power consumption.
i5-11400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 21 year, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 950 and Core i5-11400F. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 950 and Core i5-11400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.